The University of Iowa MSW Program has been continuously accredited by the Council on Social Work Education since 1951. Graduation from a CSWE accredited program is required for a social work license at the bachelors and masters level.

Form AS 4(M) A form required for Reaffirmation, Candidacy, and ongoing compliance per AS 4.0.3.   

This form is used to assist the Commission on Accreditation in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the accreditation standard below:

4.0.3 The program uses Form AS 4(B) and/or Form AS 4(M) to report its most recent assessment outcomes for each program option to constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) its findings.

All programs accredited by the Council on Social Work Education’s (CSWE) Commission on Accreditation (COA) are required to measure and report student learning outcomes.  All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) and any additional competencies programs may choose to add.  These holistic competencies reflect the dimensions (knowledge, values, skills, and cognitive & affective processes) of social work practice that all social workers are expected to master during their professional training.  

Programs determine a percentage-based benchmark for each competency and determine an outcome-measure benchmark (minimum score) for each measure. The competency benchmark (which can differ for each competency) represents the minimum percent of students the program expects to have achieved the outcome measure benchmarks in both/all measures for each of the nine competencies. The program then determines the percentage of students that attained each outcome measure (e.g., minimum score or higher), and aggregates the percentages for both/all measures together to obtain the percentage of students demonstrating competence inclusive of two (2) or more measures. The result of aggregating both/all outcome measure percentages provides the percentage of students achieving the competency benchmark. An aggregated percentage at or above the competency benchmark is considered achievement of that competency. If the program has more than one program option, the program must report data for each program option, and also an aggregate of all program options combined to determine an overall percentage of students across all program options achieving the competency benchmark.

Posting Form AS 4 for Ongoing Compliance with AS 4.0.3

Per the requirement of CSWE COA’s recognizing body, the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), and accreditation standard 4.0.3, programs must post this form publicly on its website and routinely up-date (minimally every 2 years) its findings.  Upon request, programs must provide CSWE with the weblink to the published form on the program’s website where it is accessible to the public.  Data presented on the form must be collected within 2 years of today’s date at all times. 

Form-AS-4(M) Assessment Data (2020-2021)

The University of Iowa Masters of Social Work Program
Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

Last Completed on August 9, 2021

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice

All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. Summarize the program’s competency-based assessment plan. Programs may add/delete rows to accurately reflect the number measures included in the data presented.

Assessment Measure #1: (Learning Our Collective History)

Dimension(s) assessed: Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:3847
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #2: (Case Study/Socialization Paper)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Processes
When/where students are assessed: SSW:3840
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #3: (ADA Assignment Part II)

Dimension(s) assessed: Values, Knowledge
When/where students are assessed: SSW:4843
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #4: (Research Project Proposal)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Processes
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6148
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #5: (Assessment Paper)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Processes, Affective Process
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6150
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #6: (Intervention Plan)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Processes, Affective Process, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6150
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #7: (Final Role Play Video)

Dimension(s) assessed: Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6151
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #8: (Integration Paper)

Dimension(s) assessed: Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6291
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #9: (Infographic Posting and Reflection)

Dimension(s) assessed: Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6145
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #10: (Evaluation Plan)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6145
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #11: (Learning Contract)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:6290
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

 

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Specialized Practice

Students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add, that reflect the area of specialized practice.  Summarize the program’s competency-based assessment plan.  Programs may add/delete rows to accurately reflect the number of areas of specialized practice and each measure included in the data presented.

Area of Specialized Practice #1: (Family Centered Practice)

Assessment Measure #1: (Case Conceptualization Paper)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7250
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #2: (Reading Responses)

Dimension(s) assessed: Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7251
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #3: (Research Paper Project)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7251
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #4: (Legislative Testimony)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7252
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80%
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #5: (Policy in the News)

Dimension(s) assessed: Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7252
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80%
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #6: (Research Project Report)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7270
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #7: (Practice Evaluation Proposal and Final Report)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7293, 7294
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #8: (Presentation and Paper:Case Consultation)

Dimension(s) assessed: Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7293, 7294
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #9: (Learning Contract)

Dimension(s) assessed: Skills Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7292, or 7296
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

 

Area of Specialized Practice #2: (Integrated Practice)

Assessment Measure #1: (Refugees and Immigrants Part II)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes  
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7260
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #2: (Community Practice Portfolio)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7260
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #3: (Organizational Cultural Competency Assessment Reflection)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills, Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7261
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #4: (Legislative Testimony)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Skills
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7262
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80%
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #5: (Policy in the News)

Dimension(s) assessed: Cognitive Affective Processes Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7262
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80%
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #6: (Research Project Report)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7270
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #7: (Practice Evaluation Proposal and Final Report)

Dimension(s) assessed: Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7297, 7298
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #8: (Presentation and Paper:Case Consultation)

Dimension(s) assessed: Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW: 7297, 7298
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

Assessment Measure #9: (Learning Contract)

Dimension(s) assessed: Skills Knowledge, Cognitive Affective Processes, Values
When/where students are assessed: SSW:7295 or 7296
Who assessed student competence: Instructor
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9: 80% and higher
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9: 80%

 

Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year (2020-2021)

Program Option #1: Iowa City

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Iowa City Option
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Family Centered Concentration Integrated Practice Concentration
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 99.3% 98.4% 100%
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 97.9% 100% 100%
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 98.6% 98.6% 100%
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 96% 94.5% 100%
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 100% 98.6% 100%
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 98% 100% 100%
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 94% 100% 100%
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%

 

Program Option #2: Des Moines

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Des Moines Option
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Family Centered Concentration Integrated Practice Concentration
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 99.5% 100% 100%
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 99.5% 100% 100%
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 97.8% 100% 99%
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 99.7% 100% 100%
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%

 

Program Option #3: Sioux City

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Sioux City Option
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Family Centered Concentration1 Integrated Practice Concentration1
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 100% * N/A N/A
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% N/A N/A
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 96% N/A N/A

1 - part-time program will be in concentration beginning fall 2021.
* - data from second measure will be collected in fall 2021.

 

Program Option #4: Hybrid (Online)

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Hybrid (Online) Option
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Area of Specialized Practice Integrated Practice Concentration
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 93% 100%
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 97% 100%
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100%
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100%

 

Program Option #5: Quad Cities

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Quad Cities Option
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Family Centered Concentration Integrated Practice Concentration
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%

 

Aggregate Assessment Data (All Students from All Program Options) Collected during the Academic Year (2020-2021)

Competency, Benchmark and Percentage of Students achieving Benchmark - Overall Assessment Data
COMPETENCY COMPETENCY
BENCHMARK
(GENERALIST)
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK
(AREA OF
SPECIALIZED
PRACTICE)
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
  % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures % of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures Generalist Practice Family Centered Concentration Integrated Practice Concentration
Competency 1:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
80% 80% 98.6% 99.4% 100%
Competency 2:
Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
80% 80% 99.48% 100% 100%
Competency 3:
Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice
80% 80% 99.62% 99.5% 100%
Competency 4:
Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
80% 80% 98.7% 98.1% 99.6%
Competency 5:
Engage in Policy Practice
80% 80% 99.8% 99.5% 100%
Competency 6:
Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 99.6% 100% 100%
Competency 7:
Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 99.6% 100% 100%
Competency 8:
Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 100% 100% 100%
Competency 9:
Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
80% 80% 99.7% 100% 100%